It is not possible to give the pope special powers over the rest of Christianity, since he can neither really dictate the faith of the church members nor is his office mentioned in the bible. Even the pope cannot grant you absolution and spare you from hell, etc… That means also the sale of letters of indulgence was the starting point, he argued that not even anyone in the church was able to give out dispensation or absolution at all.
That is only God's prerogative or ability. Being an attack on current practices was not meant as the founding document of a new sect.
It was firmly rooted within the church to renew and reform the church, to restore it and bring it back onto the true track. It is important to know that he did not go to a church door with a hammer in his hand, as so often portrayed. He wrote these theses in Latin and s ent them to his superiors. Luther wrote this letter by hand at first, but then he himself ordered a small printing run for the Latin text.
But when a translated version got into press things really sped up. His critique was widely rejected by his authorities, but found his audience anyway.
The printing press is key here. One of the arguments in the these is more or less: think for yourself. When people did that, they often found the rest of the arguments quite convincing. Laypersons found the greed and power aspects, theological counterparts the ideological foundation for divergence from the true faith.
Earlier attempts to criticise the recent developments of the church were indeed often centred on finances, when coming from laypeople and centered on some doctrinal teachings when coming from clergyman. But both were confined to oral spheres of influence. Like priests preaching against the church or princes arguing against bishops on in meetings. Now you had a foundational critique on the most glaring misgivings, widely disseminated thanks to the printing press, the discussion also held in the people's language, and all that on a solid foundation of deduction from the highest authority against the pope: the bible.
The resistance of the higher church authorities to anything he mentioned was one key, popular support for a now widely informed, understanding and empowered public was the other factor.
Martin Luther wasn't against "Indulgences. It was not "expressed," only "implied," that if "the Bible is the central religious authority and that humans may reach salvation only by their faith and not by their deeds," the church should not be "selling indulgences.
If so, by selling "indulgences" the Catholic Church was selling something it had no title to, in order to trick people into donating money. Then the Catholic Church was a seriously corrupted organization that needed to be replaced by something better. There is another story behind this, which demonstrated in what most might think is a modern phenomenom. The 95 theses were written in Supposedly, Luther didn't nail them to the church door, he posted them on a bulletin board outside of the church, and sent copies to the church leaders.
As the resident theologian, Luther's original intent appears to have been to generate a scholarly discussion amongst church elders for what he saw was the commercialization of faith. Indulgences, in that time frame, were a written document that gave forgiveness for sins committed, or forgiveness for sins that might be committed in the future, in return for a monetary contribution.
Originally, they were hand written, in a time when not many people had the ability to write and those that could were kept very busy, so they were fairly rare, likely reserved for a few wealthy people. With the written indulgence, you didn't have to beg for forgiveness, you just turned it in and were forgiven. But, note the date - Something else had happened, about 60 years earlier - Gutenberg had created the first printing press with moveable, reusable type.
As a direct result, both the time required to produce a document, and the cost of producing that document, plummeted. One of the first heavy users of the printing press was the Catholic Church, who was employing legions of scribes to copy scripture and other church documents. And, yes, indulgences went from something that was fairly rare due to the high cost of having it written, to something that could be turned out in the hundreds of copies, for little more than the cost of the paper.
By , the printing presses were cranking out indulgences as quickly as the presses could operate. Now, they could be produced at such a rate as to be salable to anyone, not just a select wealthy few, and friar Tetzel was marketing them to everyone.
That's when indulgences began to get out of hand This is what Luther objected to - that the church was generating profit from what should be faith. However, the story doesn't end there, and in the remaining tale can be found the other great impact of the 95 theses.
Luther not only sent copies to the church leaders, he also gave out copies to friends. Some of those friends had access to And, yes, they had copies printed up. Quite a few copies, as it turned out. This Economist article describes what happened next. In December printed editions of the theses, in the form of pamphlets and broadsheets, appeared simultaneously in Leipzig, Nuremberg and Basel, paid for by Luther's friends to whom he had sent copies. German translations, which could be read by a wider public than Latin-speaking academics and clergy, soon followed and quickly spread throughout the German-speaking lands.
The 95 Theses were quickly distributed throughout Germany and then made their way to Rome. In , Luther was summoned to Augsburg, a city in southern Germany, to defend his opinions before an imperial diet assembly. A debate lasting three days between Luther and Cardinal Thomas Cajetan produced no agreement.
God help me. I can do no other. Luther hid in the town of Eisenach for the next year, where he began work on one of his major life projects, the translation of the New Testament into German, which took him 10 months to complete. Luther returned to Wittenberg in , where the reform movement initiated by his writings had grown beyond his influence. It was no longer a purely theological cause; it had become political.
They had five children. At the end of his life, Luther turned strident in his views, and pronounced the pope the Antichrist, advocated for the expulsion of Jews from the empire and condoned polygamy based on the practice of the patriarchs in the Old Testament. Martin Luther is one of the most influential figures in Western history. His writings were responsible for fractionalizing the Catholic Church and sparking the Protestant Reformation. His central teachings, that the Bible is the central source of religious authority and that salvation is reached through faith and not deeds, shaped the core of Protestantism.
Although Luther was critical of the Catholic Church, he distanced himself from the radical successors who took up his mantle.
But if you see something that doesn't look right, click here to contact us! Subscribe for fascinating stories connecting the past to the present.
His theses challenged the authority of the Catholic Church, and sparked the historic split in The Protestant Reformation was the 16th-century religious, political, intellectual and cultural upheaval that splintered Catholic Europe, setting in place the structures and beliefs that would define the continent in the modern era. In northern and central Europe, reformers Martin Luther King, Jr. King sought equality and human rights for African Americans, the economically disadvantaged and all Generally described as taking place from the 14th century to the 17th century, the Renaissance promoted the rediscovery of classical philosophy, Christianity is the most widely practiced religion in the world, with more than 2 billion followers.
Any truly repentant Christian has a right to full remission of penalty and guilt, even without indulgence letters. Any true Christian, whether living or dead, participates in all the blessings of Christ and the church; and this is granted him by God, even without indulgence letters. Nevertheless, papal remission and blessing are by no means to be disregarded, for they are, as I have said Thesis 6 , the proclamation of the divine remission.
It is very difficult, even for the most learned theologians, at one and the same time to commend to the people the bounty of indulgences and the need of true contrition. A Christian who is truly contrite seeks and loves to pay penalties for his sins; the bounty of indulgences, however, relaxes penalties and causes men to hate them -- at least it furnishes occasion for hating them.
Papal indulgences must be preached with caution, lest people erroneously think that they are preferable to other good works of love. Christians are to be taught that the pope does not intend that the buying of indulgences should in any way be compared with works of mercy.
Christians are to be taught that he who gives to the poor or lends to the needy does a better deed than he who buys indulgences. Because love grows by works of love, man thereby becomes better. Man does not, however, become better by means of indulgences but is merely freed from penalties.
Christians are to be taught that he who sees a needy man and passes him by, yet gives his money for indulgences, does not buy papal indulgences but God's wrath. Christians are to be taught that, unless they have more than they need, they must reserve enough for their family needs and by no means squander it on indulgences.
Christians are to be taught that they buying of indulgences is a matter of free choice, not commanded. Christians are to be taught that the pope, in granting indulgences, needs and thus desires their devout prayer more than their money. Christians are to be taught that papal indulgences are useful only if they do not put their trust in them, but very harmful if they lose their fear of God because of them.
Christians are to be taught that if the pope knew the exactions of the indulgence preachers, he would rather that the basilica of St. Peter were burned to ashes than built up with the skin, flesh, and bones of his sheep. Christians are to be taught that the pope would and should wish to give of his own money, even though he had to sell the basilica of St. Peter, to many of those from whom certain hawkers of indulgences cajole money.
It is vain to trust in salvation by indulgence letters, even though the indulgence commissary, or even the pope, were to offer his soul as security. They are the enemies of Christ and the pope who forbid altogether the preaching of the Word of God in some churches in order that indulgences may be preached in others. Injury is done to the Word of God when, in the same sermon, an equal or larger amount of time is devoted to indulgences than to the Word. It is certainly the pope's sentiment that if indulgences, which are a very insignificant thing, are celebrated with one bell, one procession, and one ceremony, then the gospel, which is the very greatest thing, should be preached with a hundred bells, a hundred processions, a hundred ceremonies.
The true treasures of the church, out of which the pope distributes indulgences, are not sufficiently discussed or known among the people of Christ. That indulgences are not temporal treasures is certainly clear, for many indulgence sellers do not distribute them freely but only gather them. Nor are they the merits of Christ and the saints, for, even without the pope, the latter always work grace for the inner man, and the cross, death, and hell for the outer man.
Lawrence said that the poor of the church were the treasures of the church, but he spoke according to the usage of the word in his own time. Without want of consideration we say that the keys of the church, given by the merits of Christ, are that treasure. For it is clear that the pope's power is of itself sufficient for the remission of penalties and cases reserved by himself. The true treasure of the church is the most holy gospel of the glory and grace of God.
But this treasure is naturally most odious, for it makes the first to be last Mt.
0コメント